Confounding and misclassification.
نویسندگان
چکیده
The authors examine some recently proposed criteria for determining when to adjust for covariates related to misclassification, and show these criteria to be incorrect. In particular, they show that when misclassification is present, covariate control can sometimes increase net bias, even when the covariate would have been a confounder under perfect classification, and even if the covariate is a determinant of classification. Thus, bias due to misclassification cannot be adequately dealt with by the methods used for control of confounding. The examples presented also show that the "change-in-estimate" criterion for deciding whether to control a covariate can be systematically misleading when misclassification is present. These results demonstrate that it is necessary to consider the degree of misclassification when deciding whether to control a covariate.
منابع مشابه
Case-Control Studies with Jointly Misclassified Exposure and Confounding Variables
The issue of 2 × 2 × 2 case-control studies is addressed when both exposure and confounding variables are jointly misclassified. Two scenarios are considered: the classification errors of exposure and confounding variables are independent or not independent. The bias-adjusted cell probability estimates which account for the misclassification bias are presented. The effect of misclassification o...
متن کاملCausation, bias and confounding: a hitchhiker's guide to the epidemiological galaxy Part 2. Principles of causality in epidemiological research: confounding, effect modification and strength of association.
©FSRH J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2008: 34(3) Scope of article In Part 1 of this series the following principles of causation were considered: time order, specification of the study base, and specificity (bias due to random misclassification and bias due to systematic misclassification).1 Part 2 will consider: 2a: Confounding 2b: Effect modification 2c: Strength of association. Part 3 conclu...
متن کاملCausation, bias and confounding: a hitchhiker's guide to the epidemiological galaxy. Part 3: principles of causality in epidemiological research: statistical stability, dose- and duration-response effects, internal and external consistency, analogy and biological plausibility.
©FSRH J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2008: 34(4) Scope of article In Part 1 of this review the following principles of causation were considered: time order, specification of the study base, specificity, bias due to random misclassification, and bias due to systematic misclassification.1 Part 2 continued with confounding, effect modification, and strength of association.2 Part 3 concludes the c...
متن کاملA Bayesian Approach to Account for Misclassification and Overdispersion in Count Data
Count data are subject to considerable sources of what is often referred to as non-sampling error. Errors such as misclassification, measurement error and unmeasured confounding can lead to substantially biased estimators. It is strongly recommended that epidemiologists not only acknowledge these sorts of errors in data, but incorporate sensitivity analyses into part of the total data analysis....
متن کاملتحلیل وضعیت آنژین صدری بر اساس احتمالات طبقه بندی نادرست عامل خطر سیگار در مطالعه قند و لیپید تهران، 79-1378
Misclassification of disease status and risk factors is one of the main sources of error in studies. Wrong assignment of individuals into exposed and non-exposed groups may seriously distort the results in case-control studies. This study investigates the effect of misclassification error on odds ratio estimates and attempts to introduce a correction method. Data on 3332 men aged 30-69 years fr...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- American journal of epidemiology
دوره 122 3 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1985